<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Long vs. Short Form Content: Which Ranks Better in 2016? An In-Depth Study on 300k Pages	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/</link>
	<description>SEO Blog &#124; cognitiveSEO Blog on SEO Tactics &#38; Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:33:10 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3</generator>
			<item>
				<title>
				By: Taylor Johnson				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-200988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-200988</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for sharing those graphs! I personally like to switch up the word count lengths for my website content. I think it looks more natural to Google when website content is not all the exact word count. For example, some articles I have written are 750 words, some are 1000 and some are 2000. In my opinion, varying the lengths of your website content is an important factor in receiving high Google rankings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing those graphs! I personally like to switch up the word count lengths for my website content. I think it looks more natural to Google when website content is not all the exact word count. For example, some articles I have written are 750 words, some are 1000 and some are 2000. In my opinion, varying the lengths of your website content is an important factor in receiving high Google rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Jamie Thornberry				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-179968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Thornberry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2019 07:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-179968</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I usually have a rule that if the content is designed for Google ranking then 1800 words is the aim. If the content is purely for social media then the length can vary to best suit the audience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually have a rule that if the content is designed for Google ranking then 1800 words is the aim. If the content is purely for social media then the length can vary to best suit the audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: DURV PATHARE				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-166859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DURV PATHARE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 11:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-166859</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Perfect explanation for content writing. It have always been a problem for every  website holder to rank higher with use of long and short content. keep the good work going]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect explanation for content writing. It have always been a problem for every  website holder to rank higher with use of long and short content. keep the good work going</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Taylor Johnson				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-134751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 22:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-134751</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[We always use 1,500+ words for a locally optimized website. For affiliate websites a minimum of 6,000 words. 

Yes, there are websites ranking well with a less amount of content, but in our opinion, it&#039;s hard to &quot;overdue&quot; content on a website.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We always use 1,500+ words for a locally optimized website. For affiliate websites a minimum of 6,000 words. </p>
<p>Yes, there are websites ranking well with a less amount of content, but in our opinion, it&#8217;s hard to &#8220;overdue&#8221; content on a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Amit				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-66833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 03:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-66833</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Both can be better it just depends how you convey the details so that the person reading can somehow be interested..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both can be better it just depends how you convey the details so that the person reading can somehow be interested..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Jonathon Devitt				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-35908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Devitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-35908</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Google has a mind of its own – keywords are ranked on no particular generic methodology. Likewise, there is no general format for optimisation. SEO requires on-the-toes work-flow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has a mind of its own – keywords are ranked on no particular generic methodology. Likewise, there is no general format for optimisation. SEO requires on-the-toes work-flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Cornelia Cozmiuc				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-34628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornelia Cozmiuc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-34628</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Indeed, Radhe! Nowadays people don&#039;t tend to read long content. Yet, I believe that it also depends on the things they are looking for, their interest in a matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Radhe! Nowadays people don&#8217;t tend to read long content. Yet, I believe that it also depends on the things they are looking for, their interest in a matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: radhe				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-34586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[radhe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-34586</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Sometimes people skip long content as per my point of view write enough and interesting content usually people don’t like to read more they just want to see the answer of their search query]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes people skip long content as per my point of view write enough and interesting content usually people don’t like to read more they just want to see the answer of their search query</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Cornelia Cozmiuc				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-34315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornelia Cozmiuc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-34315</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Alexis, great point; the length of the content should of course be influenced by the platform&#039;s requirements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexis, great point; the length of the content should of course be influenced by the platform&#8217;s requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Cornelia Cozmiuc				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/11853/long-vs-short-content-ranks-better-2016-depth-study-300k-pages/#comment-34314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornelia Cozmiuc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=11853#comment-34314</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Agree on this one, content is a very important ranking factor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree on this one, content is a very important ranking factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
