<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How Google Broke the Bank &#8211; The Famous Halifax Penalty	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/</link>
	<description>SEO Blog &#124; cognitiveSEO Blog on SEO Tactics &#38; Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:16:53 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3</generator>
			<item>
				<title>
				By: Julian				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-35879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-35879</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[It seems they use sitewide links strategy for link buildings. I&#039;ve same case also, and it considered as toxic comes with greatly bad effects on SERP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems they use sitewide links strategy for link buildings. I&#8217;ve same case also, and it considered as toxic comes with greatly bad effects on SERP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: damas				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-35248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 14:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-35248</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Wow! no matter who you are (big web or small blog) there is still possible to get penalized. But, i think &quot;The Big&quot; can recover easily by paying with Google Adwords.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! no matter who you are (big web or small blog) there is still possible to get penalized. But, i think &#8220;The Big&#8221; can recover easily by paying with Google Adwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Secara Alami				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-34772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Secara Alami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 06:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-34772</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[What about the latest google algorithm in the 2017&#039;s, if google will be more strict with certain types of backlinks types. What do you think ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the latest google algorithm in the 2017&#8217;s, if google will be more strict with certain types of backlinks types. What do you think ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Suka Wisata				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-33568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suka Wisata]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-33568</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s totally hard to match what google wants and the reality. I always get blunder with the idea that states &quot;content is a king&quot;. I always write every post in my blog with the structure nearly the same as wikipedia. Let&#039;s say, 90% great content. And when I see the first top SERP, it always filled with those site which has very very poor contents. Mr Razvan, do you have any idea about this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s totally hard to match what google wants and the reality. I always get blunder with the idea that states &#8220;content is a king&#8221;. I always write every post in my blog with the structure nearly the same as wikipedia. Let&#8217;s say, 90% great content. And when I see the first top SERP, it always filled with those site which has very very poor contents. Mr Razvan, do you have any idea about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Razvan Gavrilas				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-31374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Razvan Gavrilas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-31374</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I do not think there is a relationship between these two...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think there is a relationship between these two&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Tan				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-31370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-31370</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I think big “guys” might get faster recoveries than smaller sites because they spend a lot of money for Google AdWords.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think big “guys” might get faster recoveries than smaller sites because they spend a lot of money for Google AdWords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Zach Crandell				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-31339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Crandell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2015 23:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-31339</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Always create your own content! Buying backlinks is a shady business. Great article!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always create your own content! Buying backlinks is a shady business. Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Razvan Gavrilas				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-23596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Razvan Gavrilas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-23596</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[hi Leo. here is a great study on such a small business site and its recovery for a penalty.  http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3411/unntural-links-penguin-recovery-using-the-google-disavow-tool/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Leo. here is a great study on such a small business site and its recovery for a penalty.  http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3411/unntural-links-penguin-recovery-using-the-google-disavow-tool/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Leo Koo				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-23595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leo Koo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-23595</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Great article Razvan! As always, it&#039;s an eye opener. :) That&#039;s why we don&#039;t use auto-submitters to directories. It&#039;s always a sure way to get penalised.

How would smaller sites that are penalised get their ranking back? Or should we start a new site instead? Any idea? Coz bigger sites get penalised for a short while, and then get restored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Razvan! As always, it&#8217;s an eye opener. 🙂 That&#8217;s why we don&#8217;t use auto-submitters to directories. It&#8217;s always a sure way to get penalised.</p>
<p>How would smaller sites that are penalised get their ranking back? Or should we start a new site instead? Any idea? Coz bigger sites get penalised for a short while, and then get restored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Razvan Gavrilas				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/3674/how-google-broke-the-bank-the-famous-halifax-penalty/#comment-23476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Razvan Gavrilas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=3674#comment-23476</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[until now Google applies penalties. There was a lot of discussion in the SEO industry about Google just devaluing unnatural links and not actually penalizing a site. Until now it seems that they are applying penalties and not only devaluing. Maybe in the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>until now Google applies penalties. There was a lot of discussion in the SEO industry about Google just devaluing unnatural links and not actually penalizing a site. Until now it seems that they are applying penalties and not only devaluing. Maybe in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
