<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Unexpected Ranking Boost after Sitewide Links Penalty Reduction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/</link>
	<description>SEO Blog &#124; cognitiveSEO Blog on SEO Tactics &#38; Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:29:22 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3</generator>
			<item>
				<title>
				By: Joaquin Poggi				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/#comment-35005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joaquin Poggi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 10:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=7551#comment-35005</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Hi , if we have the blog in a subdirectory and this one is in other server, for google looks like we have sitewide link ? would be better having this links in the menu only from home and in the internal with nofollow ? Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi , if we have the blog in a subdirectory and this one is in other server, for google looks like we have sitewide link ? would be better having this links in the menu only from home and in the internal with nofollow ? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Razvan Gavrilas				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/#comment-32801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Razvan Gavrilas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=7551#comment-32801</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[if your site is new and you put a lot of blogrolls pointing to it you may penalize it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if your site is new and you put a lot of blogrolls pointing to it you may penalize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Umar				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/#comment-32799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=7551#comment-32799</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I have a little question, Sitewide links in 2015 are still harmful or less harmful as compared to in 2013? I know that google now consider sitewide link as one but still blogroll link hurts your SEO?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a little question, Sitewide links in 2015 are still harmful or less harmful as compared to in 2013? I know that google now consider sitewide link as one but still blogroll link hurts your SEO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Razvan Gavrilas				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/#comment-32318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Razvan Gavrilas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 08:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=7551#comment-32318</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[sometimes penalty removal does not mean traffic increase because it is like you have never had those links in the first place. this means that you need to acquire new links in order to get higher rankings. if the penalty was removed you are allowed to grow again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sometimes penalty removal does not mean traffic increase because it is like you have never had those links in the first place. this means that you need to acquire new links in order to get higher rankings. if the penalty was removed you are allowed to grow again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Deepak vskart				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/#comment-32296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepak vskart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 11:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=7551#comment-32296</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I read this post from top to till end. Everything mentioned is what I have followed to get the penalty revoked from my site vskart.in however, it has been more than 3 months now, but I could not see any improvement in the traffic. Before penalty, i was getting 800 visits per day and now I am getting 100+ per day only. Is there anything I should do to get the traffic back? As of now, I am doing more Social media than blog commenting, article posting to article directory, etc. as I am now afraid of such things.

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this post from top to till end. Everything mentioned is what I have followed to get the penalty revoked from my site vskart.in however, it has been more than 3 months now, but I could not see any improvement in the traffic. Before penalty, i was getting 800 visits per day and now I am getting 100+ per day only. Is there anything I should do to get the traffic back? As of now, I am doing more Social media than blog commenting, article posting to article directory, etc. as I am now afraid of such things.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Bryan				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/#comment-31751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=7551#comment-31751</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Nevyana! You bring up a good question.

When we took on the client all of our efforts went into addressing the site-wide manual penalty–a rather large task. We didn&#039;t spend much time optimizing the site from an on-page perspective. So, after getting the site-wide match penalty dropped to a partial match penalty we decided to refocus our efforts on &quot;getting the house in order&quot; to gain more traction in the SERPs.

We knew the partial match penalty was not going to simply disappear. We had all intentions on getting the remaining partial match penalty removed.

I hope this helps shed some light for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nevyana! You bring up a good question.</p>
<p>When we took on the client all of our efforts went into addressing the site-wide manual penalty–a rather large task. We didn&#8217;t spend much time optimizing the site from an on-page perspective. So, after getting the site-wide match penalty dropped to a partial match penalty we decided to refocus our efforts on &#8220;getting the house in order&#8221; to gain more traction in the SERPs.</p>
<p>We knew the partial match penalty was not going to simply disappear. We had all intentions on getting the remaining partial match penalty removed.</p>
<p>I hope this helps shed some light for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Bryan				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/#comment-31750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=7551#comment-31750</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree with you more, Kostas.

Automation = Fail

Strategy = Success]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more, Kostas.</p>
<p>Automation = Fail</p>
<p>Strategy = Success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Nevyana Karakasheva				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/#comment-31749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nevyana Karakasheva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=7551#comment-31749</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Great case study Bryan:)

Really interesting story, though it gets me thinking - why after such an indisputable success with your reconsideration request on your first try, you wait for 9 months to try to revoke the remaining penalty as well. Maybe the rankings recovery was satisfactory enough and you were hoping for the penalty to expire?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great case study Bryan:)</p>
<p>Really interesting story, though it gets me thinking &#8211; why after such an indisputable success with your reconsideration request on your first try, you wait for 9 months to try to revoke the remaining penalty as well. Maybe the rankings recovery was satisfactory enough and you were hoping for the penalty to expire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Beakon				</title>
				<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/7551/unexpected-ranking-boost-after-sitewide-links-penalty-reduction/#comment-31748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beakon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=7551#comment-31748</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Aww..SENuke, now this rings a bell. How many &quot;SEO&quot; tools to count, GSA, Scrapebox, I cannot even remember! Good old times that are now gone. 
SEO&#039;s who are stuck in the past are exaclty this, past. Luckily there are tools like CognitiveSEO that can erase your dark, sinful past.
Kostas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww..SENuke, now this rings a bell. How many &#8220;SEO&#8221; tools to count, GSA, Scrapebox, I cannot even remember! Good old times that are now gone.<br />
SEO&#8217;s who are stuck in the past are exaclty this, past. Luckily there are tools like CognitiveSEO that can erase your dark, sinful past.<br />
Kostas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
