<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>interflora case study &#8211; SEO Blog | cognitiveSEO Blog on SEO Tactics &amp; Strategies</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/tag/interflora-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog</link>
	<description>SEO Blog &#124; cognitiveSEO Blog on SEO Tactics &#38; Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:37:07 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Backlink Analysis &#8211; Google Penalties Case Studies</title>
		<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2439/backlink-analysis-google-penalties-case-studies/</link>
				<comments>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2439/backlink-analysis-google-penalties-case-studies/#comments</comments>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Razvan Gavrilas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backlink Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Penguin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webinars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interflora case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo case study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=2439</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>We had a &#8220;full-house&#8221; Webinar on Friday (all 100 seats were occupied). As promised to everyone in the webinar here is the recording for to digest. Main Topics What are Unnatural Links? How do I spot them? How do I recover from an Unnatural Links Penalty? Quick Overview of the recent Interflora Penalty. &#8220;Unnatural Link&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2439/backlink-analysis-google-penalties-case-studies/">Backlink Analysis &#8211; Google Penalties Case Studies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog">SEO Blog | cognitiveSEO Blog on SEO Tactics &amp; Strategies</a>.</p>
]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a <strong>&#8220;full-house&#8221;</strong> Webinar on Friday (all 100 seats were occupied). As promised to everyone in the webinar here is the recording for to digest.</p>
<p><iframe name="wistia_embed" src="http://fast.wistia.net/embed/iframe/ciuruc01of?controlsVisibleOnLoad=true&amp;version=v1&amp;videoHeight=400&amp;videoWidth=640&amp;volumeControl=true" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="640" height="400"></iframe></p>
<h3>Main Topics</h3>
<ul>
<li>What are Unnatural Links?</li>
<li>How do I spot them?</li>
<li>How do I recover from an Unnatural Links Penalty?</li>
<li>Quick Overview of the recent Interflora Penalty.</li>
<li>&#8220;Unnatural Link&#8221; Sites Analyzed &#8211; Case Studies</li>
<li><strong>    </strong>SmartLipo &#8211; Medical Surgery Niche</li>
<li><strong>    </strong>Allesovergokken &#8211; Online Gambling Niche Netherlands</li>
<li>    Webhostingmadness &#8211; Webhosting Review Niche</li>
<li><strong>    </strong>Learnenglishindublin &#8211; Learning Foreign Languages Niche</li>
</ul>
<h3>What are Unnatural Links?</h3>
<ul>
<li>Links that are created with the sole purpose of influencing a search engines rankings.</li>
<li>Mostly DOFollow links, these links can be spotted by Google using trained algorithms that search for specific patterns in specific niches.</li>
<li>These algorithms are also &#8220;helped&#8221; by humans that verify specific sites and possibly flag them. You can read more about this if you search the cognitiveSEO blog for <a href="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/1307/google-rating-webspam-guidelines/">Google Rating &amp; Webspam Guidelines</a>. There was a leaked document last year that explains the process.</li>
</ul>
<p>A few examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>blog comments built at mass scale</li>
<li>link networks that interlink and link to a specific site to help it increase its rankings</li>
<li>paid dofollow links (advertorials, sponsored links etc )</li>
</ul>
<p>More on the subject <a href="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/604/identify-low-quality-links-easily/">here</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>The BIG 3 Rules of Ranking with Natural Links</h3>
<p><strong>1. Google is a machine that is trying to &#8220;emulate&#8221; the real world.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>What it seems unnatural in the real world should be unnatural to Google. (if it is not now, it will be in the future)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>2. Become Trust Worthy!</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Prepare for this. It Takes Time. (like in real life).</li>
<li>Basic Idea &#8211; Show Google that you are Trust Worthy and Google will give you Ranking Juice.</li>
<li>Gain Trust without Commercial Anchor Text.</li>
<li>Be Strategic &amp; Patient.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>3. After Google Trusts you Don&#8217;t Abuse it!</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Start using Commercial Anchor Text to guide Google to rank you better.</li>
<li>Continue to build trust!</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>The BIG 5 Rules of Unnatural Link Analysis</h3>
<p><strong>1. Each niche is different, and this can be seen by the different link profiles.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>This is from a naturalness point of view.</li>
<li>Everything has a Context. Put is out of the Context and it has no value.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>2. The same rules to identify unnatural links in different niches will not apply.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>There are generic ones that will apply though, such as &#8211; high number of low metric links.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>3. Look for Backlink Profile Extremes.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Analyze from different angles. Profile by Site Type, Link Type, Metrics etc.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>4. Big Density of Commercial Anchor Text compared to Brand Anchor Text</strong></p>
<p><strong>5. Look for Links with Similar Footprints. (Advertorials, Link Networks, Footer Links etc)</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>How should I recover from Unnatural Links Penalties</h3>
<ol>
<li>Identify &amp; Mark the Unnatural Links.</li>
<li>Ask the site&#8217;s webmasters to remove those links.</li>
<li>Most of them won&#8217;t, so your only chance is Google Disavow.</li>
<li>Do it carefully! Don&#8217;t sent the whole list of links to Google. It won&#8217;t work.</li>
<li>Explain what happened and give details for as much unnatural links as possible.</li>
<li>Remove all unnatural links from an affected domain.</li>
<li>Wait &#8230; while &#8220;waiting&#8221; start building natural links. Increase your Trust and Dilute you Bad Link Profile.</li>
</ol>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Quick Overview on the recent Interflora Penalty</h3>
<ol>
<li>Interflora is a site that sells flowers in the UK and other countries. It is one of the biggest flower sites in the UK.</li>
<li>Approximately a week ago it was penalised by Google and the entire SEO community started to analyze this.</li>
<li>My opinion is that this is an enforcement of another guideline from Google regarding &#8220;advertorials&#8221;. This is because Matt Cutts himself posted the same day on twitter a short note about the specific guideline.</li>
<li>There were other cases in the past with sites like JC Penney and others that were penalized by Google.(&#8220;brands&#8221;). For Google this is the easiest way to spread the word about an enforcement of their guidelines.</li>
<li>A way of educating the SEO community.</li>
<li>Was this purely about other unnatural links? I do not think so. Other competitors of Interflora have a big amount of unnatural links and still they are not penalized. This was about <strong>&#8220;Advertorials&#8221;</strong>.</li>
<li>If we check these against their competitors we will see that this makes the difference.</li>
<li>A &#8220;new old&#8221; unnatural link = the advertorial link.</li>
<li>What it works today &#8230; might not work tomorrow!</li>
<li>But a lot of spammy tactics still work.</li>
<li>Work for a day or a week. But if you plan for longer than that you have to comply.</li>
</ol>
<div>Read more on the <a href="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2366/interflora-penalty-advertorials-gone-wrong/">interflora penalty here</a>.</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2439/backlink-analysis-google-penalties-case-studies/">Backlink Analysis &#8211; Google Penalties Case Studies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog">SEO Blog | cognitiveSEO Blog on SEO Tactics &amp; Strategies</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
							<wfw:commentRss>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2439/backlink-analysis-google-penalties-case-studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interflora Penalty &#8211; Advertorials Gone Wrong</title>
		<link>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2366/interflora-penalty-advertorials-gone-wrong/</link>
				<comments>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2366/interflora-penalty-advertorials-gone-wrong/#comments</comments>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Razvan Gavrilas]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertorials case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interflora case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low quality links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/?p=2366</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>After the last few days when every SEO pro, and his dog, wrote about the Interflora penalty, I decided to take a look into the case. What I found out is that, in my opinion, Google seems to enforce another old guideline. That is: &#8220;Advertorials&#8221; Google Advertorial Update Mockup I ran an indepth analysis on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2366/interflora-penalty-advertorials-gone-wrong/">Interflora Penalty &#8211; Advertorials Gone Wrong</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog">SEO Blog | cognitiveSEO Blog on SEO Tactics &amp; Strategies</a>.</p>
]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the last few days when every SEO pro, and his dog, wrote about the Interflora penalty, I decided to take a look into the case. What I found out is that, in my opinion, Google seems to enforce another old guideline. That is:</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;"><strong>&#8220;Advertorials&#8221;</strong></h3>
<p><a href="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/google-advertorial-update.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="align center size-full wp-image-2371 aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid grey;" title="Google Advertorial Update" src="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/google-advertorial-update.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="1200" srcset="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/google-advertorial-update.jpg 600w, https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/google-advertorial-update-150x300.jpg 150w, https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/google-advertorial-update-512x1024.jpg 512w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Google Advertorial Update Mockup</strong></p>
<p>I ran an indepth analysis on <a href="http://cognitiveseo.com/">cognitiveSEO</a> for Interflora and some of its top competitors, that are still ranking.Here are some of my findings.</p>
<p><strong>1. </strong>The Interflora backlink profile does not look more unnatural, that any of its, still ranking, competitors. They all have <a href="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/604/identify-low-quality-links-easily/">low quality links</a> from :</p>
<ul>
<li>blogs</li>
<li>forums</li>
<li>web-directories</li>
<li>and tons of other low quality sites that might be considered as being root of this <a href="http://searchengineland.com/after-penalizing-interflora-uk-newspapers-google-warns-against-advertorials-149371">penalty</a>.</li>
</ul>
<div></div>
<p></p>
<div><strong>2.</strong> The sites do have a good mix of brand/commercial anchor text.</div>
<div><img class="align center  wp-image-2383 aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid grey;" title="Anchor Text Cloud Interflora" src="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ANCHOR-TEXT-CLOUD-INTERFLORA.jpg" alt="" width="600" srcset="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ANCHOR-TEXT-CLOUD-INTERFLORA.jpg 1000w, https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ANCHOR-TEXT-CLOUD-INTERFLORA-300x177.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /></div>
<div></div>
<p></p>
<div><strong>3.</strong> Approximately all of their link profile distributions are the same.</div>
<div><a href="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/link-profile-distrbutions-interflora.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="align center  wp-image-2384 aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid grey;" title="Link Profile Distrbutions Interflora" src="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/link-profile-distrbutions-interflora.jpg" alt="" width="600" srcset="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/link-profile-distrbutions-interflora.jpg 1864w, https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/link-profile-distrbutions-interflora-300x135.jpg 300w, https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/link-profile-distrbutions-interflora-1024x460.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1864px) 100vw, 1864px" /></a></div>
<div></div>
<p></p>
<div><strong>4. What these sites do not share are the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertorial" target="_blank">advertorials</a>&#8220;.</strong></div>
<div><strong></strong> It seems also that Interflora started removing the &#8220;advertorial links&#8221; as fast as they can.</div>
<div></div>
<div><a href="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/interflora-advertorial-links.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="align center  wp-image-2385 aligncenter" style="border: 1px solid grey;" title="Interflora Advertorial Links" src="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/interflora-advertorial-links.jpg" alt="" width="600" srcset="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/interflora-advertorial-links.jpg 1860w, https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/interflora-advertorial-links-300x68.jpg 300w, https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/interflora-advertorial-links-1024x232.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1860px) 100vw, 1860px" /></a></div>
<div></div>
<p>Unnatural links are the penalty, obviously, and this is because most of the trust of a site is carried through links, these being the epicenter of any Google ranking. But in this case, <strong>Google might try to enforce</strong> another existing rule from their <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.ro/2013/02/a-reminder-about-selling-links.html" target="_blank">guidelines</a> &#8230;</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">&#8220;Advertorial Marketing&#8221;</h3>
<p>If we take in consideration Matt Cutts&#8217; recent affirmation that paid advertorials are to be treated as any other link, based on Google&#8217;s quality guidelines, this strengthens my belief even more.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-2376 align center aligncenter" title="Matt Cutts Advertorial Update" src="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/matt-cutts-advertorial-update.jpg" alt="" width="509" height="320" srcset="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/matt-cutts-advertorial-update.jpg 509w, https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/matt-cutts-advertorial-update-300x188.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 509px) 100vw, 509px" /></p>
<p>Coincidence? I do not think so. Most of the stuff that Matt Cutts says on his social media accounts is <strong>&#8220;measured&#8221;,</strong> taking in consideration that any wrong wording could lead to wrong conclusions made by the SEO industry.</p>
<p>If it is a general low quality links penalty, then why did not Google penalize all of the sites listed here ( plus many more). All of them share a lot of <a href="http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/604/identify-low-quality-links-easily/" target="_blank">low quality links</a>.</p>
<p>What counts is that now you should <strong>think twice</strong> before buying an advertorial. Doing it slowly is still ok, but if you do it on large scale you should <strong>mark your links as &#8220;nofollow&#8221;</strong> to be able to &#8220;fly safe&#8221;. It does not matter if your links contain brand or commercial anchor text, they are treated the same. Interflora had a lot of brand anchor text advertorials that got them penalized.</p>
<p>What are you thoughts on this penalty? Is it worth the name of an update?</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2366/interflora-penalty-advertorials-gone-wrong/">Interflora Penalty &#8211; Advertorials Gone Wrong</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://cognitiveseo.com/blog">SEO Blog | cognitiveSEO Blog on SEO Tactics &amp; Strategies</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
							<wfw:commentRss>https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2366/interflora-penalty-advertorials-gone-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
							</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
