{"id":17734,"date":"2018-03-02T12:50:11","date_gmt":"2018-03-02T10:50:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/?p=17734"},"modified":"2018-04-05T14:43:17","modified_gmt":"2018-04-05T11:43:17","slug":"from-0-to-100000-customers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/17734\/from-0-to-100000-customers\/","title":{"rendered":"Sujan Patel on How to Go from 0 to 100,000 Loyal Customers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;re thrilled to bring to your attention the third episode of our cognitiveSEO Talks: On Search and Traffic, this time with a beloved digital expert, Sujan Patel. He&#8217;s a marvelous marketing expert, entrepreneur and growth hacker widely known for his multiple publications and articles in the industry, his successful management of various big companies, and his extensive knowledge in\u00a0the world of digital.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>We constantly feel the rush to know what that one or the other say about something of big interest to us. Needless to say about the desire to read people&#8217;s minds. And we think we found a solution to that &#8211; our podcasts are meant to present you influencer facets that few have ever seen before &#8211; they&#8217;re like an open book, and this is entirely their choice. But the thing is &#8211; you cannot stop listening to them. Their marketing insights are pure gold.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"563\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/LuVFjxVWZN8\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"autoplay; encrypted-media\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCQMrMnn9ySK7ieo3fi9bsZA?sub_confirmation=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-18341\" src=\"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/bt-subscribe-to-youtube.png\" alt=\"subscribe to cognitiveSE) youtube channel\" width=\"418\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/bt-subscribe-to-youtube.png 418w, https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/bt-subscribe-to-youtube-300x39.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 418px) 100vw, 418px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"166\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"no\" allow=\"autoplay\" src=\"https:\/\/w.soundcloud.com\/player\/?url=https%3A\/\/api.soundcloud.com\/tracks\/407523123&amp;color=%23ff5500&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;show_teaser=true\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/sujanpatel\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"><strong>Sujan Patel<\/strong><\/a> is the co-founder of Web Profits and a Managing Partner at Ramp Ventures, the team behind Quuu.co, Mailshake.com, Narrow.io, Linktexting.com, and Pick.co.\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sujan is a leading expert in digital marketing, he has his own blog, sujanpatel.com and he also does guest blog at least 6 times a week.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>His experience of 13+ years in the growth and content marketing industry and his personal charm make his publications to be read and sold like hot bread. All his tips are based on his own experience in running his companies and helping others succeed and stand out on the market.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Sujan is a high-energy individual, fueled by his passion to help people and solve problems.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Patel&#8217;s the &#8220;take action instead of reading&#8221; type of person. Mostly known as a risk-taker, Sujan is abundant with actionable tips on digital marketing, entrepreneurship, and life as a whole. Just listen to him on our cognitiveSEO Talk, and you can draw your own conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Tackled Topics :<\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Sujan&#8217;s experience with internet marketing and entrepreneurship<\/li>\n<li>Solutions for professionals that are leading multiple companies at once<\/li>\n<li>What are the best means of teaching marketing to people?<\/li>\n<li>On video and vlogging<\/li>\n<li>Is it different to rank, drive traffic, and grow a business nowadays than it was in the past?<\/li>\n<li>To read and study, or to take action &#8211; that is the question<\/li>\n<li>Top 3 things to focus more on as a marketing professional<\/li>\n<li>Who influenced Sujan Patel the most in his career and why<\/li>\n<li>How to get more productive as a marketer and\/or businessman<\/li>\n<li>On creating educational content<\/li>\n<li>Sujan&#8217;s advice for marketing beginners<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>10 Marketing Nuggets:\u00a0<\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>I do a really good job of is saying no to things that won\u2019t move the needle. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=112\" rel=\"nofollow\">1:52<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li>It is very important for a SaaS business to figure out when do people activate and what is that \u201caha\u201d moment and define it. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=824\" rel=\"nofollow\">13:44<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Word of mouth is good; we knew that if we enable our customers, make them happier and smarter, we get more of it. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=1071\" rel=\"nofollow\">17:51<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li>I found that the best subject lines are 3-5 words, and the best emails have no more than six sentences. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=1948\" rel=\"nofollow\">32:28<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li>If I get the same question asked 2-3 times I essentially create a video. I hate answering the same questions over and over again. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=2031\" rel=\"nofollow\">33:51<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li>It takes maybe 100 articles to deliver the same level of trust, as a video does. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=2317\" rel=\"nofollow\">38:37<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li>It\u2019s not about the tactics. It\u2019s about finding your weaknesses in your funnel, your weaknesses and strengths in your channel, either doubling down on restraints or fixing those weaknesses. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=3025\" rel=\"nofollow\">50:25<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li>The best way to measure all of our efforts in term of top-of-funnel is not how much traffic you get, but it\u2019s to see how many people are talking about you, how many people are referencing your content. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=3066\" rel=\"nofollow\">51:06<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li>My Northstar metric is the number of mentions my brand or company gets per month.\u00a0<strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=3176\" rel=\"nofollow\">52:56<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Stop reading. Please, stop reading more content and start figuring out how to take action on the content you read. <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/LuVFjxVWZN8?t=3312\" rel=\"nofollow\">55:12<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Video Transcript<\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"transcript\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Thanks, Sujan, for accepting my invitation. As I told you before, you had a big impact on my professional career in the past few years and I couldn\u2019t \u00a0have wished for a better guest for the 1st edition of this podcast. So a thing that struck me when looking at your bio is the fact that <em>you\u2019re basically the Co-Founder for a growth-marketing agency, you\u2019re a Managing Partner at Ramp Ventures that basically supports 5 tools like Quuu.co, Mailshake.com, Narrow.io, Linktexting.com, and Pick.co, you have your own blogs, sujanpatel.com for example, and you\u2019re also guest blogging at least 6 times a week or something like that<\/em>.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>How do you structure your time, how does your day look like, how do you prioritize stuff? Do you have a system in place or something like that?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Sujan<\/b>:\u00a0I think the first thing I look at, in order for me to manage my time effectively, is to treat all of the Ramp Ventures properties as if they were clients. If you\u2019re running marketing for a $5-10 million business, it\u2019s not that complicated if you have 1-2 growth channels, you kind of focus on those channels and so, to put the answer simply, all Ramp Ventures properties have usually one or two different channels that we use to grow.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>There are a lot of them in common: so we only acquire, work with, or build companies that can grow very heavily with word-of-mouth and referrals, meaning the product is doing a lot of the heavy-lifting for marketing. So product marketing is no. 1; word-of-mouth and referrals is the byproduct, the output of having a great product and having good marketing or good UAT (User Acceptance Testing) within the product.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The other thing is concept marketing, you know, building an email list or database, having an audience. <em>But all of this is two things: it\u2019s content marketing and it\u2019s word-of-mouth<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now, what <strong>I do a really good job of is saying no to things that won\u2019t move the needle<\/strong>. So, a lot of times people are \u201coh, let\u2019s try this channel, let\u2019s try this growth hack, let\u2019s try this and that\u201d. I usually pretty much say no to like 99.9% of things that cannot move the needle for us. In terms of managing an agency, you know, we have a really, really good team. (This is my second agency) I\u2019ve found that what I\u2019m really good at is the strategy, is the team management, and again, I\u2019m not writing ad copy for clients, I\u2019m not writing a blog post, you know, we\u2019re not even doing a lot, we\u2019re creating long-form or high-value, high-quality, extremely high-quality like 10 X pieces ebooks, things like that, so we\u2019re doing a lot with a little.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now that little takes a long time to do as well, but again, we have a really good team, and then in regard to still writing content I actually, and I\u2019ve said this many times before, I actually start by talking to content. So, the latest blog post on my site, sujanpatel.com, are all things I\u2019ve just sat down and was talking to somebody; I talk to, usually, my editor and my editor would then transcribe things and say \u201cok, out of the 30 minutes you talked about this, here are the 6 or 7 takeaways. I usually have an outline of the things I wanna go through, and then essentially it\u2019s going to be a transcription and an outline of that, and then I will go right, so that will help frame the story and the details and, you know, again, our mantra is like: it needs to be easy to understand &#8211; meaning using human language, not like jargon, and minimizing the use of, you know, fanciness that just goes over people\u2019s heads &#8211; and no.2, it needs to be actionable. So, with that, we have a really really good framework of the story and in 15 to 30 minutes I can come up with 3000 to 5000-word post that would normally take me hours. Now, it does take maybe 90 minutes, 45 to 90 minutes to complete end-to-end because it takes time to add in an intro and outro and then find details, but what I don\u2019t do is, you know, I don\u2019t worry about the specifics. So, for example \u2026 not the specific, but I don\u2019t worry about doing the research and things like that; that are things anybody can do. So I look at what are the things that I can do and that nobody else can do. And that\u2019s the stuff I work on and once I do things, you know, a hundred times over, I\u2019m doing things a lot, I pretty much either find somebody who is better at it than me, or either continue doing it or figure out a way to make it a productive use of my time.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So, I typically write in the mornings and evenings, and either on Saturday or Sunday I usually wake up early, a couple of hours before my wife wakes up, and I pretty much knock out a bunch of work and creative content, and then on a day-to-day basis, we have clients at Web Profits and Ramp Ventures and also other clients, so we treat them accordingly and this works well because all of these businesses are, you know, in terms of size, fairly small, right? We don\u2019t need a CEO, we don\u2019t need a General Manager just yet, but as these things grow we will probably hire, you know, smarter people to do a better job than we are now. But until then, we can manage.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>cognitiveSEO<\/strong>:\u00a0So you\u2019re a productivity master, let\u2019s say. That\u2019s what I get from your reply. So you specified the fact that you like to focus on only some channels, but how do you find the channels you should focus on without testing them first?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>How do you find the channels you should focus on without testing them first?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Sujan<\/b>: I do the math. I do projections and, you know, from experience, I can tell you that <strong>there are only really 5 or 6 different channels of growth<\/strong>. And again, maybe there\u2019s more but this is only my opinion, right?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s SEO, or let\u2019s just call in that \u2018marketing SEO and content marketing\u2019, and everything that is in that, there\u2019s PPC or paid social, so AdWords, Facebook ads, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, whatever.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s always new channels emerging, I\u2019m sorry, new kinds of networks emerging within that channel, so like Quora ads, right? That\u2019s a new one &#8211; do I wanna test it? Probably. Also, media buys a kind of one-off advertisements are there as well. But I look at everything. As one channel, are we doing a lot of paid? That determines on our economics.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Are you an economics for a business, or a conversion rates to simplify things for each business or our clients. So for example, what\u2019s the CPC (Cost Per Click), how much search volume or volume is there in that space, and what is an estimated conversion rate we can get you to a trial or to a paid customer?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Often times I find that if you apply, let\u2019s just say, a general conversion rate, I typically say \u201cok, (let\u2019s just use Mailshake as an example) our conversion rate is 1.5% from visitor to paid customer &#8211; this is a blended conversion rate from all of our traffic, so this is literally the number I pulled from GA (Google Analytics) including all traffic, so it\u2019s not just new visitors, but everybody\u201d. It\u2019s probably higher for just new visitors but let\u2019s just say it\u2019s 1.5%. We know our LTV (Lifetime value), I won\u2019t share that, but we know our LTV. So we know what we afford to pay at the top at. And we\u2019re 9 months old so our company LTV is going up. So it really means it\u2019s undetermined, but in a usually upwardly directory because the longer a business has been around, the higher the lifetime value you\u2019ve been having. But anyways, long story short, I look at the CPC, I time it to the conversion that we have now, it gives me the potential tack, and I look at how much volume there is, meaning how much traffic can I get, and that tells me how big this channel\u2019s gonna be. So, now, when I do the CPC, I\u2019m looking at who else is out there, and how competitive it is and whatnot, but ultimately, if that number, that map there tells me it\u2019s gonna get me anything under a hundred customers, a hundred customers a month, I don\u2019t do it. If the cost proposition is too high, I don\u2019t do it. So in this case Mailshake doesn\u2019t do paid because the cost per acquisition is too high, and based off of what we can spend we were knocking any more than a hundred new customers a month. And that, you know, to be honest, my time is better spent on making our channels that do work better because we can squeeze more value out of it.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So that\u2019s how I look at things. Now, if I apply that math, that simple formula, again, that\u2019s what every marketer does, right?, I find a lot of people don\u2019t do this when they try to discover what channels they should focus on. What they\u2019re trying to do, a lot of people\u2026 again, I\u2019m putting words in other people\u2019s actions, but I see this every day from my blog, people emailing me, potential clients, saying \u201cI wanna do this, that, and the other\u201d, you know, and we have clients, who say \u201cok, we have $1million annual budget for marketing\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The question is how do you best play that million dollars? It\u2019s not trying everything, it\u2019s trying the right things that you know they can yield really really good results, and can be growth channels. So as in the early days it\u2019s figuring out what your growth channels are and, doing those, you should always be testing, poking, prodding, but for me right now Mailshake were a better use of my time than it was spending time on conversion rate, improving the word-of-mouth, engaging and building with that audience instead of going after a whole new channel because I still have to do all of \u00a0the other things, but if I don\u2019t have them now, I don\u2019t know how to figure it out, then the new channel, let\u2019s say, paid, is not gonna work for me. So it tells me I don\u2019t need to worry about it yet. And that means I can sleep better, and that means I can say ok, differ to 6 months from now.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Talk us about the marketing plan or the marketing actions you did in the first 90 days after launching, or before launching LinkTexting. Go in depth and on specifics?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sujan<\/strong>: So, when we acquired LinkTexting in Q3 (third quarter) of 2016, so about almost a little under a year ago now, the first, you know, I brought things up through fixing, and improving the things that were just broken or needed to be improved and then proactive marketing, growth, right? So we bought this company and when I looked at the company I was like \u201cWhat are all the holes, &#8211; I pretty much when I do an audit, I look at what are the holes in it &#8211; so conversion rate sucked, traffic was low. So one of the biggest things is traffic is low; the other thing is the brand was dead, meaning no one talked about it. We had customers, but no one really talked about it. The industry, mobile marketing or mobile apps &#8211; so LinkTexting is a tool that\u2019s a simple widget you just put on your website, specifically a desktop website, to a little phone number form there so that when somebody fills up that form, you\u2019ll text them a link to your app instead of like download it on iOS or AppStore. Because on a desktop, when you click on the iOS download, it opens iTunes, and you\u2019re not looking at downloading a computer app, you want a mobile app. So, what that means is nobody really does this. I also talk to our customers, our most active customers, and ask them what do they love about LinkTexting, what do they like, what do they use it for, what do they hate? So that told me the things that I need to improve on the product.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>When we looked at it the product was very much an MVP (Minimum Viable Product), which is a good thing and a bad thing. The reason it\u2019s great is that it means a lot of upside opportunities for us. So we went through the first 90 days, my partner and I went on, he leads kind of all development and project management for everything that needs to be done to the product, like the website, while I lead all the marketing and growth, and then we converge in the middle, that is on the product marketing side.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So there\u2019s a lot of holes in the product. People were asking for or complaining about \u201chey, you have no metrics\u201d, so we built metrics. The whole UX (User Experience), looking at the whole website and <strong>the UX did not clearly tell us the value proposition of what the heck the business was.<\/strong> In fact, it took us about 5 minutes, or 3-5 minutes to explain to new people what the heck we do. And that\u2019s a complicated thing.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So imagine if I had a 3-5 minutes conversation to explain what the heck it does, imagine how crystal clear the website has to be in order for it to explain what we do in 10 seconds. Right? So it wasn\u2019t clear what we do. So <strong>we redesigned to homepage, we added more pages, we created a mobile app playbook because we found was that a lot of people come to LinkTexting when they\u2019re right about to embed or right about to launch their website or their marketing efforts.<\/strong> So they don\u2019t know a lot about marketing, so we teach them about marketing.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>To create content about each market was one of the things we first started doing. The other things, again, fixing the whole UX from like visitor to paid customer. We created email onboarding sequence &#8211; I\u2019m not a big fan of Intercom that drift tight messages in-app just yet, because one, we don\u2019t have a big team to support them; we have 2 customer support people. We just recently hired somebody; before that it was me, and so I was like \u201cwhoa, how much customer support can I do? The intentional people want live feedback and we don\u2019t have the potential, so we stopped, we cut that completely. But anyway, so <strong>we focused on email onboarding, the UX and flow to go from visitor<\/strong>, so we redesigned the homepage, and the frontend website and the whole backend flow to build out a widget. We figured out what the activation point is.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Another thing, that\u2019s very very important in a SaaS business is to <strong>figure out when do people activate and what is that \u201caha\u201d moment<\/strong>, right? People say \u201caha\u201d but let\u2019s define it. It\u2019s when they freakin\u2019 use your company tool or whatever you do, right? So when do they get success using your tool? So Mailshake is when they first send a campaign, so activation point is: they upload a list, they write the email template, and they send it off. LinkTexting is when they create a widget and they embed it on the website. If you don\u2019t do that, it doesn\u2019t matter, you will never activate. So we fixed that flow and then we found out a lot of people didn\u2019t sign up for the paid program because frankly, we didn\u2019t tell them to purchase. So like the whole, when you\u2019re in the product when you\u2019re logged in, never ever has a website told you \u201cupgrade!\u201d. So who made that more prominent? And, you know, what we had before was this little tiny button link that says like \u201cupgrade your account\u201d, and then below that says \u201cget 50% off if you refer a friend\u201d and it was set up using ambassador, or reward stream, or something of that nature, and nobody used that. But like if you look at the value proposition nobody\u2019s gonna sign up if you\u2019re automatically discounting a 50% and nobody\u2019s gonna refer your business before they even sign up or activate. So we killed that.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>We asked people for referrals and to spread the word when they\u2019re 6 months in, 90 days in when they\u2019ve actually successfully used this.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I also went to town doing customer interviews &#8211; I main support the first 90 days so I understand the pay points of what it takes to, what people are thinking when they actually go in there with a product, that helps me understand how I can do marketing and it helps me build a customer persona and so what I do is that I build a customer persona around our audience &#8211; who are they.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>There are 2 people:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Is there a product manager &#8211; if they\u2019re a larger business and there are many customers you want, then they\u2019re product managers, they\u2019re in charge of product organization,<\/li>\n<li>They\u2019re founders, CEOs, CTOs, \u00a0they have their own mobile app, a very small organization, but those guys they just wanna set up and go.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>They don\u2019t need much help besides how to set it up. So for those guys we hired a support developer to essentially enable people (this is now going in from like I would say 91 days to the first 120, so the first 6 months, the second three months, the second 90 days of the first 6 months we hired a support developer to help customers implement, because we\u2019ve found out that customer demographic per persona they\u2019re busy, you know, they don\u2019t need to learn something new, in fact, they don\u2019t wanna learn something new when our tools preventing them from learning something new it solves that problem (that\u2019s our main value proposition because you can build out this whole LinkTexting system yourself entirely or whatever, but that takes like a month or whatever and nobody wants to do that for something so simple, or nobody should do that for a small little whim). So anyway, long story short, we help customers activate because we know that\u2019s a big problem by simply just helping them do it for them.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And so then<strong> we started creating content for the blog initially created a lot of content targeting \u00a0mobile app developers and CEOs, CTOs<\/strong>, again, of small companies and we found out our money-making companies &#8211; we have Expedia, we have HubSpot, we have Adobe, we have lots of big Fortune 500 public companies that are our customers and these guys are our best customers, they\u2019re product managers, that\u2019s what the person is purchasing. We shifted the gears recently to focus all of our content marketing efforts on our prior demographic, product managers, what do they wanna know, who cares what we do, we wanted to be just a viable solution, we want to be a valuable and educational resource for our target demographic, because when we educate the industry, we make people aware.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Another big thing that we did is we understood what channels we can use to grow. Again, <strong>word of mouth is good<\/strong> &#8211; we knew that if we enable our customers, make them happier and smarter, we get more of it. We determined SEO\u2019s not huge because if we look at the search volume for a lot of this stuff it was really small. If we rank no.1 for all our product keywords we will gain extra 5 retained customers a month. That doesn\u2019t move the needle for anybody! So we focused on content marketing, push marketing essentially, right? So, people aren\u2019t searching for a solution. So we have to create enough value of content that can educate the market and then they will be \u201caa, that\u2019s what you guys do. I\u2019ll sign up\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So <strong>instead of trying to make people sign up immediately, we focused on valuable educational content<\/strong>, and if they like what they hear, they\u2019ll sign up and we can optimize from there on.<\/p>\n<p>So that\u2019s it!<\/p>\n<p><strong>cognitiveSEO<\/strong>:\u00a0Yeah. I love the value delivery part because I\u2019m also a big promoter of that and I love the fact that you\u2019re a very pragmatic marketer, let\u2019s say; you don\u2019t go multi-channels and spend money left and right to what sticks and what doesn\u2019t, things like that. So you\u2019re a very pragmatic \u2026 you have a very pragmatic approach but in smart way.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sujan<\/strong>:\u00a0Yeah, thank you. Just one note here is that I like to use my logic to drive decisions, and I think that a lot of people just forget it because they\u2019re like \u201coh, there\u2019s this awesome growth hack I just read about this\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Well, <strong>put it into perspective of what that\u2019s gonna do for you<\/strong>. If you\u2019re just starting off and you have zero channels, you\u2019re not gonna get your first channel if you go and try ten. You\u2019re gonna get your first channel if you execute properly. Where as, for example, Mailshake, you know, we\u2019re growing like wildfire; everything I\u2019m doing right now for Milkshake, because we have our word-of-mouth through for all channel is huge. Our product has all the marketing for us. So I have two things I need to do: I need to make that work better, the channel that works, I need to optimize it.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Number 2 is I need to find more channels, so with Mailshake we have a lot more budget and more opportunity to throw shit at the wall, right? We can\u2019t be that illogical marketer that says \u201cLet\u2019s go try these things!\u201d, because one, we try the traffic, two, we have the customers, &#8211; because we already have 10 000 customers that we can test out with a pretty decent size email list because we did marketing and we\u2019re getting into that in a bit, but we did marketing while the the product was live, to build up education in that audience. And lastly, we have the luxury of time, meaning my new marketing channels &#8211; concept marketing, PPC, building an email database, webinars, ads, sponsorships, those are all the things that we are working on there, have 6-9 months before they need to net a positive URI (Uniform Resource Identifier). So I have time.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong style=\"background-color: transparent;\">cognitiveSEO:\u00a0<\/strong>Yeah, yeah, and I think that the most important thing is the fact that having a pragmatic way to look at things gives you the opportunity to see what things are working and what not, if there\u2019s a demand on the market, because you can have the greatest product in the world with the best UX, but if there\u2019s no demand and word-of-mouth marketing shows you whether there\u2019s a demand or not, we cannot focus on PPC (Pay Per Click) or sponsorship if there\u2019s no demand for your product. Like in your case, LinkTexting is still a small company, it\u2019s used by big players but Mailshake proved itself that it has a big audience, has a big demand, and you can go further and find new challenges. I think that\u2019s what I get from our discussion.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sujan<\/strong>:\u00a0One thing to add. To put it down even simpler, <strong>when you go from 0 to 100 customers, it\u2019s a lot of hustle<\/strong>. And when you hustle, it\u2019s like anything you can do to grow this thing and keep it to make it survive, right? \u2026 That\u2019s like forget everything that I\u2019ve just said. It\u2019s like do whatever it takes to make it work. Go 1to1 and go sell door to door, right? That can work.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>When you go from 100 to 1000<\/strong>, that\u2019s what LinkTexting is at,<strong> it\u2019s about that pragmatic approach and spending your dollars and time very very effectively and doing it right<\/strong>, I find that it\u2019s one or two channels that get you from 100 to 1000 customers.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>From 1000 to 10 000, it\u2019s very much like \u201cok, let\u2019s go find 2 or 3 channels\u201d<\/strong>, from 10 000 to 100 000, or 100 000 to 1 million customers and that number will change kind of depending on your LTV or your MRR, but ultimately that\u2019s what you have to get institutions in place, like for example, when Mailshake has a hundred thousand customers, we\u2019re trying to get to a million, or you might find out a hundred thousand is our RP but either way we need a team, we need multiple channels. It\u2019s very much deploying the right resources and the right channels, where the 10 000 to 100 000 customers and that means it\u2019s how do we best use our time, capital, and resources.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>cognitiveSEO:<\/strong> One trend I noticed when talking about LinkTexting and Mailshake is the fact that you\u2019ve created this huge 10X pieces -the mobile app playbook and the email outreach playbook-,\u00a0 and one thing I noticed in the past few month when talking about email outreach with somebody is that they\u2019re always talking about that resource, your resource. So how did you come up with the idea of having this kind of resource because it takes both time and money to do them because they\u2019re huge, and what was the main strategy behind them before launching them? And how did you promote them, how did it go when building links to them and so on?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>How did you come up with the idea of having this kind of resource, what was the main strategy behind them, and how did you promote them?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sujan:\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong>So it\u2019s funny enough \u2026 so let\u2019s talk about mobile, the email outreach because that was the first one we did. And I would say that <strong>was a failure because the idea behind it was to create something educational,<\/strong> but it was a failure in a couple parts, but its success at the end of the day it worked. So, in the beginning, our goal, our KPI (Key Performance Indicators), our objective one to hit was that <strong>we wanted to rank on Google for cold email outreach, cold email related keywords<\/strong>. Well, it does rank but it doesn\u2019t drive much traffic, so I failed initially because we did this before, when I had a lot more proven formula to validate that there is the man, meaning if I were to rank no.1 how much traffic would I get turns out that traffic from search is really really small. I said \u201cOh, crap! That\u2019s not good\u201d, right?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The second objective was we had a user base of customers because Mailshake came from content marketing, I also migrated the few thousands customers over for my connected product, so <strong>we had people who were like \u201chow do I use this freakin\u2019 tool?<\/strong>\u201d. They were beta testing before it was even out for sale, so the goal was let\u2019s educate our market, let\u2019s educate. I had a hypothesis that a lot of word-of-mouth \u2026 we engineered the product to be very very cheap and very very simple, which are two big pinpoints the industry has right now because our competitors for the most part are more expensive and\/or a little more complicated to use. So that was our core advantage. So anyways, we knew this going in, so we\u2019re gonna enter going really low and kind of grow out on market.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>But going back to the playbook, <strong>all my goal was to educate our customers<\/strong> and I was hoping that if by educating our customers we would create value, they would talk about us more, they would be smart and share it. Because we didn\u2019t have anything to market because the product called all of the 2016 \u2026 My co-founder and the developer of Mailshake was building Mailshake, which was pretty much a version 2.0 of Connector, now we\u2019re version 2.0 of Mailshake but anyways my point being is that from nine months I was seeing my hands like \u201cCan I do a marketing ad? Can I do a marketing ad? Can I do a marketing ad\u201d and I\u2019m like \u201c I need to build a brand.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nobody knows what the heck Mailshake is\u201d and so I was like \u201cWhat can I do?<\/strong>\u201d. We have beta users using this beta product that we can\u2019t even talk about it, and even if they talk about it, nobody can sign up. So where can I put all this energy from people, myself? What can I do to help build this company before the company is there, right? So that\u2019s why I decided to build an educational 10X pieces content and the goal and how we came about it was that we found a gap, right? We looked at all the cold email related keywords, all the content and a lot of them are outdated, yes, and I call people out, yes, where it has content that\u2019s just mediocre, and they\u2019ve been doing for like since 0809 so they have a lot of outdated content. Other marketers have content that it was really robust and it was very situational like \u201chow I did this using X Y Z\u201d. Not at all repeatable.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Where I also saw another gap and my friend Chris Winfield told me about this when he was giving me early product feedback, is like \u201cHey, Sujan, you know one of the things I see the most viable of your product?\u201d, and I\u2019m like \u201cYeah, just tell me, tell me!\u201d. And he\u2019s like \u201cit\u2019s not your product, it\u2019s the fact that you have email templates. You have email templates and nobody else has really email templates\u201d. <strong>We had email templates since 2015 and, to the best of my knowledge, I don\u2019t think anybody else had it<\/strong>, and that was intentional but anyways, he\u2019s like \u201cyou should make these email templates public\u201d. And so, in our ebook, in the Cold Email Outreach playbook, well, let\u2019s go make our best email templates public. And not the ones that are situational and that I see everywhere else, but the ones that are very applicable to many different situations.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So yeah, that\u2019s kind of what came out of it. Now, as far as people liking it, sharing it, where that came from is 1. I was \u201cOK, we\u2019ll gonna launch this. How we\u2019re gonna promote this thing? We\u2019re gonna do email outreach, let people know, anyone including the article, let them know. We\u2019re gonna be launching a prototype because that\u2019s a big resource, we will ungate the content so that it will rank well for SEO\u201d and, let\u2019s face it, nobody ever in the history of mankind reads a 20 000 word article on the web, a downloaded pdf, right? And so I was like \u201cLet\u2019s make this ungated, and let\u2019s them at some point ask them for an email address\u201d. Well that turned into a great lead; we know lead generation for us, we get about 35-40% of people opting in their email address for that, so now we have a way to collect email addresses that\u2019s not \u201cHey, sign up for announcements for our product launches\u201d; it\u2019s actually valuable stuff. So we had email addresses, so that way all the stuff was \u201cOk, we\u2019ll launch, our email database is gonna be even bigger. So that\u2019s it\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>I was hoping to get more traffic from search, but what ended up happening is that people liked the content<\/strong>, which was, again, is engineered or created for people to find value and to be a resource that\u2019s not out there, so, naturally, people shared it. People share a lot on their private Facebook groups, and all I continued to do after the product launch was to take those people that are in the email database of customers and the email database with non-customers and email them weekly or biweekly with more valuable content. So now just making them smarter. And I\u2019ll tell you, our content is not much better than Yesware.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>All my competitors that I made fun of early on, all it is is valuable to our customers. I would give myself a C- in our blog and content marketing in August 2017, but now we\u2019re down for it to make sure we have absolute unique content because the first thing we needed to do is content educating our customers, and when I talk to our customers again by maining support the first, you know, 6 months of the company, I found that our customers aren\u2019t raised awesome marketers like you or they\u2019re like \u201cI want the cutting-edge stuff\u201d, they\u2019re like \u201c I want the basic stuff: how do I send an email, how do I write an email template\u201d. These are really basic stuff.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I also found that the advanced guys, the advanced marketers are like over complicating all this crazy stuff like \u201cI\u2019m gonna push and analyze this sentence, that sentence, or whatever\u201d then writing this long-form email copy and I\u2019m like \u201cwait, hold on, how do you even know somebody read the first sentence?\u201d. And the reality is they probably didn\u2019t even open your email or read the whole thing, and they\u2019ve just opened it, marked it as spam or deleted it. So I was \u201cLet\u2019s go figure out what makes email the best. And again, all of this was stuff that was very very dead simple.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I gave a talk 2-4 months ago this past summer in Poland in front of a bunch of sales professionals, and my talk was about maybe 13 different things you should be doing in your cold email, as in how you should be going and people were \u201caah, uu\u201d. And the one they liked the best was the one that\u2019s right in everyone\u2019s face for the last decade. Value first, keep your email short and scannable. It\u2019s never gonna change! But anyways, that\u2019s kind of \u2026 the obvious stuff was so far gone because people are focusing on advanced stuff but I was \u201cLet\u2019s just bring back down to very very basic stuff\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>cognitiveSEO<\/strong>: Yeah, I had the chance to experience that recently in the past week. I have a colleague that works in the Sales Department and does a lot of cold calling and cold emailing, and he was sending me his templates on cold email\u2026 those long emails and I told him: \u201cDude, first connect to the guy; so, try to connect with him on social media, chat with him, I don\u2019t know, comment on one of his shared delivered value somehow, create a connection, then send him a short email\u201d. And it worked way better. So he came back \u201cDude, that worked!\u201d. Of course it works. It\u2019s all about the relationship. Sales already has a bad reputation &#8211; why make it worse?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sujan<\/strong>:\u00a0Exactly, exactly. I found that\u2026 so we\u2019ve sent about 12 million emails from Mailshake so far; I found that the best subject lines are 3-5 words, and the best emails have no more than six sentences. Forget the character count, but it was like five or six different sentences. But yeah, I mean, you\u2019re spot on! It doesn\u2019t matter what the heck you do, how much time you can save them. If you don\u2019t get them to listen to you, nothing matters after that, so focus on that, yeah.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>cognitiveSEO<\/strong>:\u00a0Let\u2019s change the topic a bit. I\u2019ve noticed that recently you put much more effort into video, so your YouTube channel is ramping up with more videos, the cadence is increasing, and also the quality of them. What is the reasoning behind that? It\u2019s like you\u2019re betting on video. But why is that?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Recently you put much more effort into video. You\u2019re betting on video. But why is that?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sujan:<\/strong> Yeah, so I started doubling down on video in 2015, about two years ago, and it kind of took me a little too long to evolve to where I\u2019m at now, because I was busy with conferences, running businesses etc. I create videos in bulk; I usually create 4-5 videos. <strong>My videos are half-repurposed for my content, half questions that I get asked all the time.<\/strong> So somebody asked me \u2026 <strong>if I get the same question asked 2-3 times I\u2019m gonna essentially create a video on it<\/strong>. Because I hate answering the same questions over and over again. So that means people need it, right? And I literally just say \u201cHey, give me a week; I\u2019m gonna answer this in a video\u201d and then I give a response.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s problems I see in this space. I created a video recently, it\u2019s not out yet on like \u201cHow to apply for a job and how to stand out\u201d. There\u2019s a better title than that but the essence of this was like I was interviewing for a customer support person or interviewing a customer support role at Ramp Ventures and I hated every applicant. And I\u2019m like \u201cHow the heck \u2026 it\u2019s 2017! How the heck is this so bad?\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Somebody sent me a picture of their resume, they took a picture on their phone of their resume, and I\u2019m \u201cHow is this acceptable?\u201d. I don\u2019t care where, how, what position you\u2019re applying for at a company, this is not acceptable. Whether you\u2019re applying for a job at McDonald\u2019s, Starbucks, or a Fortune 500 or startup, it doesn\u2019t matter, you never send a picture of your resume, right? I just got so bad resumes that I got frustrated and I was like \u201cLet me just create a video on how to do this\u201d. Because it turns out that is a big weakness or pain point, and there\u2019s too much stuff that\u2019s like clutter. But anyway, why I\u2019m doubling down on videos is, the short version is, videos can convey emotions, passion, like you can see me using my hands, if I get closer it generally means I\u2019m excited or I\u2019m yelling at you, but you can see that emotion, right? In content, we can\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The other reason is every dummy in the world can create content. I can read an article and I can summarize it, right? But that doesn\u2019t necessarily make me good, because a lot of freakin\u2019 people out there which really piss me off sometimes, particularly this morning, that are just kind of writing stuff and I\u2019m like \u201cHave you even done this before? Like, have you done this? And if so, when was the last time?\u201d. So it separates the experienced marketers , in my opinion, it separates me from the guys that are just creating content, who have that one whim. Because <strong>I can go and talk about how to build $100 million company from all these articles I\u2019ve read, but I\u2019ve never done it<\/strong>. If I talk about that on video, I\u2019m gonna have to say at some point \u201cYou have to figure out I haven\u2019t done it before, so how the hell am I going to talk about that?\u201d. And so, it\u2019s just to kind of add more flavor and kind of separate people from the wannabes.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The last thing is that I found that people, and this not \u201cI found\u201d, it\u2019s just that generally people absorb things differently. <em>Some people read books, some people read articles, some people listen to podcasts, some people like ebooks, some people like videos, some people like courses, some people attend conferences &#8211; those are all ways to learn<\/em>. So why not incorporate video into the mix?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Because there\u2019s a great amount of people who learned through videos. I actually started \u2026 <strong>I hate reading, I actually add things to pocket, and I have it read to me, I love audiobooks, and the reason I like audiobooks and listening to stuff is because I can walk around the house, I can drive, I can just be out and about<\/strong>. I hate most podcasts because they\u2019re 45 minutes and inside that 45 minutes, somewhere in there, 10-15 minutes of really good value, and I just don\u2019t have the patience to get there. So my podcast is essentially 15 minutes of just value and no other bs; my videos are like 5 minutes of stuff. And so videos are a way for me to go after long tail as well because I go out for a very very specific thing and talk about it. So that\u2019s it.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I mean, in my videos, to be honest, I get &#8211; I\u2019m gonna call myself out here but &#8211; I get anywhere in between 200 views and 1000 views on average for most videos but if, again, I get 200 views those 200 views, the engagements on that thing, the number of emails and people with whom I have real life conversations with is higher on 200 views that it is on 10 000 views on a blog. Because they\u2019ve actually heard my voice, right? And it\u2019s the closest you can get \u2026 <strong>webinars and videos, is the closest you can get to in-person real relationship, from conferences or shaking hands with people online<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>cognitiveSEO<\/strong>:\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I always say that marketing is all about gaining attention and building trust, and I think video is one of the best way to be authentic and gain that trust from the end-user. I think it takes, I don\u2019t know, maybe 100 articles to deliver the same level of trust, as a video does. So I think that\u2019s the trait of the video. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And another reason, I think, is the fact that we should be everywhere like we\u2019re trying to do. We have, like you said, people that don\u2019t read articles, but listen to podcasts &#8211; you should be there if you want to have reach. Or other people might be searching Youtube tutorials and marketing stuff and they\u2019re always like \u2026 I once talked to one of my colleagues, one member from my present team, and he told me about his plan on learning more (he\u2019s a beginner in SEO) most stuff on Youtube, about SEO; that\u2019s his favorite channel.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sujan<\/strong>:\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018<strong>Cause you can find a problem and go solve it, right<\/strong>? Brian Dean has a bunch of good videos, and I\u2019m late to the video game, but if you look at Facebook, LinkedIn, they\u2019re doubling down on video, right? These platforms have been doubling down, so I get more views on my Facebook videos, if I upload them natively, than I do on my YouTube videos, because there\u2019s an audience, there\u2019s people, the discovery is some kind of solved, and that\u2019s why ultimately Facebook has kind of kicked Snapchat\u2019s butt even though it\u2019s not targeting different people &#8211; it\u2019s targeting millennials or whatever -, but anyways, yeah, video is such a powerful thing and the engagement is much much higher. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>cognitiveSEO<\/strong>:\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One thing that I know about you is that <strong>you have a big background in SEO<\/strong>, at least in the past. So how do you see the evolvement of SEO in the past few years, moving from, I don\u2019t know, back in the US, 15 year ago, people were focused only on page optimization and buying links, and right now we\u2019re not talking about SEO; in fact, we\u2019re talking about things like content marketing as an SEO strategy. What do you think? I know that you have lots of experience on this exact line.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>What do you think about SEO&#8217;s evolution?\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sujan<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0SEO has kind of evolved and it\u2019s always gonna keep evolving. Frankly <strong>SEO has gotten so hard that you need to do all things for marketing to rank<\/strong>. I remember I got started when my first business was in high school. I put white text on a white background and I just stuffed keywords in there, stuffed keywords in my meta description, and it worked! I ranked well on Google, it was awesome! <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Then, I think it was Florida that just wiped me out &#8211; I got wiped out a couple times, then the first couple big updates that Google got smart &#8211; so, my agency went Penguin and Panda came out and we were good. In fact, we had more business because people were \u201cOk, I got penalized. Can you help us?\u201d. \u201cYes, we can\u201d. Because SEO is the long game, right? The <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">bohemia <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">of Google is never gonna go away. Yeah, people might go to Facebook, whatever, but that\u2019s gonna be evolving. So, I think first and foremost, SEO has gotten complicated to where you need to do more than just optimize page status, page structure. That stuff, and any technical SEO, you need to do that. That is one part to play, that\u2019s the base you need to do to play, but what that used to be was the bigger part of what helped you rank; now it\u2019s like one part that you definitely need to do to show up.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The other thing is, 15 years have gone by, so <strong>people for 15 years have dominated SERPs<\/strong> (Search Engine Result Pages). And they\u2019ve done it, so how do you beat somebody that\u2019s done it for longer? You have to be better. And how to be better to catch up to somebody that has done it for 15 years? When I look at my competitor at Mailshake, Yesware, it might not even be technically with the same functionality features but they\u2019re competitive, they\u2019ve been out there almost 7-8 years longer than us &#8211; how do we beat them?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On SEO, content marketing. <strong>Why I love content marketing is that it does the things that help you rank.<\/strong> So let\u2019s just assume you have all the technical SEO stuff done, you need to build links. Well, Google\u2019s already freakin\u2019 penalized everybody for building all the different types of easy or low-hanging fruit ways, so now you can build the links the harder way, you have to earn the links, you have to build relationships.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><em>You could still do old-school like broken link building &#8211; still works<\/em>, I do that every once in awhile, or I\u2019ll do that as a first thing -, you can look at your competitors, where they\u2019re being mentioned, go build relationship with those guys, but what do I say to build a relationship or with somebody who is linked to my competitors \u201cHey, look, link to me, I\u2019m better!\u201d &#8211; that doesn\u2019t work anymore. They\u2019ve already been seeing that pitch a million times and they\u2019re like \u201cScrew you, SEO spammer!\u201d. So, you have to add, I like to add content and value educational information to go out and about building links.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So, what I love about content marketing is that if you do it right, you get links, you earn links, no.2 is it gives you an excuse to reach out to people for \u201clink building purposes\u201d to get more links, no.3 is yes, it will help you rank long term because you go after long tail, you go after all these keywords, but it also helps you drive traffic immediately. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Look at my Email Outreach playbook; we get a lot of social traffic, we get a lot of people who\u2019d say \u201cHey, we love this article, we love this guide, whatever\u201d. That article, through content marketing, has achieved much more traffic in <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">RRI (Response Resource Inventory) <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">than anything we\u2019d get from search. So the expanse to push marketing. So the company like LinkTexting, where they\u2019re like \u201cIt\u2019s boring, it\u2019s been done, it\u2019s old industry\u201d (where \u201cold\u201d being like 3-4 years), content marketing can bring it traffic to the door. Because you can appeal, just like on Facebook ads, while there also was. If you know the target demographic, you can create content to target that target demographic regardless of the search term. So, I think it\u2019s become more than that, but where I see a big weakness in content marketing is that most people fail to turn page views into emails, or page views into conversions. And no.2 is most people fail to get traffic to their content. Or promote their content effectively.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>cognitiveSEO<\/strong>:\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And I think <em>Google got way better at reverse engineering the human mind, the searcher mind<\/em>. So, basically they\u2019re looking at engagements, factors, they\u2019re looking at people that are coming back from the result they clicked on and coming back from the search engine. The oldest factors are taken into consideration and they create a score or something like that which shows if that article delivers or connects with the reader or not. So it\u2019s not about only putting the keyword in the title, and the H2s in the first paragraph of the text, I think that\u2019s not relevant so much anymore. I think they\u2019re still working, they\u2019re part of the average, but those are not the most important things for sure when talking about SEO. So I think Google tries to deliver value to the SERP results.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>If you had the chance to tell every person one thing before doing marketing, what would that thing be and why?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Sujan:<\/strong> I think the biggest thing is <strong>learn everything that you can learn<\/strong>, like go read Neil Patel blog, go read Rand\u2019s blog, like these guys, are kind of in the same industry opposing a lot of thoughts a lot of times, go read the content. Everything is available. I get a lot of emails &#8211; you know, I built a decent size audience &#8211; I get a lot of emails with questions and I am like \u201cCan\u2019t you just google that question? Why the hell are you asking me?\u201d. And not that I\u2019m saying my time is better used than someone else\u2019s is, but ask yourself what you wanna learn, who\u2019s the expert, and then google it and see if your expert has written articles about it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So I think there\u2019s a lot of information out there, so it\u2019s more competitive than ever to rank and drive traffic and grow business, however the education has levelled up and has levelled the playground because now the knowledge is at everyone\u2019s fingertips. 10 years ago, if you had to go build a marketing campaign, you might have to guess a little bit. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Now, literally there\u2019s 1500 case studies, you can do a B2B, a SaS company, B2C e-commerce, crowd-sourced company, how they grew by X% doing what, you can learn a lot of things, and I think what you wanna do is I recommend everybody to read. I see a lot of people still doing that, but read and then make an outline of what your playbook is gonna be. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And when you ask influencers and people for questions, what you should ask them is for feedback on your outline. And why that\u2019s important is because if you email me &#8211; anybody emails me a says \u201cHey Sujan, I wanna know what you think \u2026 Can you give me feedback on my B2B\/SaS content marketing plan \u2026 and here\u2019s what I\u2019ve done\u201d. You know, everything\u2019s in the Google.com. If you can give me 5 minutes, I will give you feedback. I can, I have enough information to give you feedback. That would be something I would charge my agency tens of thousands of dollars for free, right? If you can assess people really really easily.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And so I\u2019ve come out open and said \u201cHey, if you ask questions more than twice, I\u2019m gonna do a video on it\u201d, right? So I literally kind of \u2026 people can drive my behavior in a sense, but I think a lot of other influencers and experienced marketers that have a business are open to giving you feedback so ask questions, but don\u2019t ask stupid questions. And stupid questions &#8211; my definition is \u201cthings you can google\u201d. Ask \u201cWhat do you think of this plan?\u201d. Don\u2019t say \u201cWhere do I start?\u201d, because you should google that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>cognitiveSEO<\/strong>: Yeah, and I think another challenge on the reading part is, people that are asking me at the beginning of their career is the fact that they don\u2019t know where to start. So they have a huge problem with the noise; lots of noise in the marketers\u2019 industry.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Sujan<\/strong>: There\u2019s a lot of information. I actually have a video on how to start your career in digital marketing on YouTube, that\u2019s my most successful, most visited or viewed video. So if you just go to my channel, there\u2019s two videos on it, but yeah\u2026 they\u2019re very very \u2026 <strong>It\u2019s about learning and building relationships at the beginning<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>What\u2019s that something that you used to believe in but now you disagree with?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Sujan<\/strong>: Mm, I don\u2019t know\u2026 So, I don\u2019t know, I think like, you know, as I get smarter, as the industry evolves, things change. <strong>The industry is a moving target<\/strong>, right? <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>I think there is no guaranteed win, there is no final belief<\/strong>. Your belief should evolve with space as it moves. And so I\u2019ve always believed in building an audience, adding value to people\u2019s lives, educating as a way to market and build a brand. That\u2019s not gone away whether it\u2019s technical SEO \u2026 <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I don\u2019t believe that a growth hack tactic can work &#8211; that won\u2019t get you very far, and so I think a lot, you know, when I was growth hacking in the early hay days when Sean Ellis came up with it in 2011, and other guys like him doing it, I believed that tactics would help and as I started seeing the tactics, I saw the results of how much they helped and quickly realised that it\u2019s not about tactics. It\u2019s about finding your weaknesses in your funnel, your weaknesses, and strengths in your channel, either doubling down on restraints or fixing those weaknesses. And I can tell you that the thing that\u2019s never changed is when the weaknesses in someone\u2019s funnel it\u2019s twofold: <\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They don\u2019t get enough traffic &#8211; just go get more traffic. Yes, it\u2019s easy to say, but there\u2019s 5 channels; go figure it out. <\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">People fail to convert traffic. Go AB testing, go figure out what the value proposition is that you can have, and if you can\u2019t solve those funnels, either early stage companies or ideas is shit or you\u2019re completely going after the wrong audience.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>What are the 3 things a marketer should focus on more and 3 things to focus less on?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Sujan<\/strong>: The 3 things to focus more on:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong> 1. Do the math on your ideas<\/strong>; do the math on whatever you read, whatever you come across &#8211; somebody tells you something \u2026 I had a conversation with two other agency guys and they\u2019re like \u201cOh, this one channel, I\u2019ll just call it out!\u201d. They\u2019re \u00a0HubSpot partners, and they\u2019re saying \u201cHubSpot does a crazy amount of business for us!\u201d. And I\u2019m like \u201cAwesome!\u201d; at first I thought \u201cThat\u2019s cool, man, I should get on that!\u201d. And then I was like \u201cHey, wait, (later in the conversation) what do you define as crazy amount of opportunities?\u201d. And they\u2019re like \u201cYeah, we get 5-10 new leads\/month!\u201d and I\u2019m like \u201cOh! I don\u2019t care about that! I don\u2019t about 5 or 10 new leads, I thought you were talking about 100 new leads!\u201d. So, do the math. Define what you think it\u2019s amazing. For Mailshake we\u2019re growing back 500 new customers\/month. To me, that\u2019s amazing! Is that amazing to you, is that amazing if <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Canon\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">grows back 500 new customers\/month? Probably not; they\u2019re way further than us. If they go back to 500 new customers\/month they\u2019re probably losing revenue, or like they\u2019re bleeding dry. And so think about the math. Think about the person\u2019s situation, and decide for yourself, it that\u2019s the thing that\u2019s right for you.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>2. Stop reading<\/strong>. Please, stop reading more content and start figuring out how to take action on the content you read. So this is not\u2026 it\u2019s like the same thing with content marketing quality versus quantity; go from quantity of reading &#8211; and I see this all the time, you know, we\u2019re in a Slack group, and I see it all the time -, we\u2019re all producing so much awesome content but if you were to take any blog post you read in the last six months and you said \u201cOk, I\u2019m gonna take action on one of the things\u201d, you can probably go to just one blog post and take one action. That combination is much much better than just reading more because you\u2019re not taking action. So take action on your content even if that means you have to read less &#8211; and I actually have a blog post on this exact approach and how I do it, not that that\u2019s what everyone should do but I\u2019m sure you can link to it on your shownotes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>3. Be transparent, be vulnerable, be a human being, and share the information you\u2019ve learned<\/strong>. The reason why, I\u2019ll tell you, the selfish reason you should be teaching people and being transparent, it\u2019s because it gets your head out of your ass. When you teach somebody how to do something or when you share it you realise you have to decipher it from like what you did to what you did, how it worked, and how others can repeat that process &#8211; you get smarter. You take the thing you\u2019ve done and you\u2019ve now made it three steps or ten steps, or whatever. That means it\u2019s more repeatable for you, right? So the selfish reason is you get better at things by teaching people. That\u2019s why we \u2026 I have a philosophy of all of our staff, everyone we hire, we have a daisy chain method of trainings so the person who learned something last, they\u2019re teaching the next person in the door, because they, that teaching process &#8211; obviously they may be supervised or may have help -, but that teaching process helps them master it. Now, the second reason, the non-selfish reason is you essentially are making the world a better place. You\u2019re teaching people how to do things, and again, if you don\u2019t do it, someone else will, and so being transparent, being open about that stuff, you don\u2019t, like there\u2019s no black box of magic tricks of how to grow a company; that stuff is already discovered, so to teach people.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The things I\u2019d like to see people <em>do less<\/em> of:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>1. Round their mouths on a tactic that has won and applied it<\/strong>, like \u201cthis is a company X by doing Y\u201d. Reality is you grew your company X by doing Y because of Z. And the Z is your situation, it\u2019s where you\u2019re at. So knowledge, if there\u2019s that Z factor, and share it, don\u2019t go so much after pageviews and whatnot. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>2. Don&#8217;t\u00a0 stop focusing<\/strong> on like, even though we\u2019ve been saying this, the top marketers \u00a0have been saying this for about at last five years, people still do this, is to stop creating quantity of content. I had a client coming in here and said \u201cHey, I\u2019ve read a Hubspot article; we have to create 18 articles a month\u201d, and I\u2019m like \u201c<em>How are we gonna update the quality of 18 articles\/month<\/em>\u201d. I mean \u201cHow the hell are you going to create 18 articles\/month? That\u2019s a lot of money!\u201d. You\u2019ll gonna have to spend on and create 18 articles &#8211; that\u2019s a lot of time. What are those 18 articles gonna do? Sure, when the HubSpot article was written, in 2013, 18 articles was awesome! That was probably the thing to do, although I\u2019d argue that part wasn\u2019t the case. So focus on quality of content and then get your cadence, right? Again, don\u2019t just go out there do things, and create consistent cadence around things because that\u2019s what you think is right. Do it once, figure out how to do it again and then come up with the cadence you can do. When we first started &#8211; like, there\u2019s a reason why there\u2019s only one Mailshake playbook; it\u2019s because we haven\u2019t figured out the other one to do, right? We don\u2019t know what is is-. So instead of going and trying out five different things I\u2019m like every ounce of energy that I have in content marketing is \u201cWhat is that one big thing I can create again?\u201d, not \u201cWhat are five more I should be doing?\u201d. So cadence is not as important as success, so you wanna build successful cadence. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>3. Don\u2019t ever stop evolving<\/strong>, right? I remember end of 2013, I\u2019d been doing at that time marketing for almost 10 years and I was running a large agency. I was so hard to move from the day-to-day and the strategy and the tactics we used, I kind of had my head in my ass, like what\u2019s working and what\u2019s not? And that\u2019s because I didn\u2019t keep my thumb on the pulse of the industry and I got left behind. It took me a year and a half to really catch up and get ahead. And so you know what industry pass you by, like AI, Thoughts, Messenger, Snapchat, Quora ads, all these things are new and they came up like in six months so if you were in the day-to-day in the last six months, you may have been misused. It doesn\u2019t mean you should go out there, but you should still be aware of the opportunities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Who\u2019s the person that had the biggest influence on you?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Sujan<\/strong>: I think the person who has had the biggest influence on me is probably <strong>Neil Patel<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I don\u2019t wanna look up to people who have the same view as me, I don\u2019t really learn anything, it just helps to to kind of validate what I\u2019m doing which it doesn\u2019t make me grow. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So I think there\u2019s two big reasons why is Neil has helped me a lot in my career. 1. <strong>He\u2019s the one who actually got me started<\/strong>. Back in 2002, Neil was doing SEO and he was like \u201cHey, Sujan, I gotta tell you about this hot new thing I\u2019m doing. It\u2019s called Search Engine Optimization\u201d, and I was like \u201cWhat is this?\u201d, and he was \u201cLook, it\u2019s easy. You just do this, that, and the other, and then it works\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The other thing he did early on in my career was to <strong>make it hard for me to learn<\/strong>. So he didn\u2019t just say \u201cOh, hey, Sujan, here\u2019s the thing I\u2019m doing, here\u2019s exactly the steps, here\u2019s the article to read&#8221;, he\u2019s like \u201cNo, hey, you should look into this SEO thing. It\u2019s really easy, it\u2019s working for me, and it\u2019s really really easy\u201d, and I\u2019m like \u201cHow do I do this?\u201d, and he\u2019s like \u201cGoogle it\u201d. That\u2019s the first thing he said to me. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I actually think the said \u201cJust search for it\u201d, because Google wasn\u2019t a thing at that point. But anyways, he made it really hard. I just had to figure it out by myself. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And he never really gave me the short answer. I think that probably was just kind of his style when he was busy or whatever, but that making me do the work made me such a better marketer, now fast forward kind of 15 years I don\u2019t agree with what he\u2019s doing, I don\u2019t know everything he\u2019s doing, he\u2019s kind of turning into this mad scientist, but I can tell you the guy has been producing content for 15 years of which 6 or 7 of years I have seen, I\u2019ve paid attention, I\u2019ve seen &#8211; again, my main metric is brand mentions &#8211; I\u2019ve seen his brand go to the roof, and it\u2019s all about that consistency. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There are very few people out there that have done it as consistently, providing a lot of education and value\u2026 I think on the Internet he has a pretty bad wrap of like being a douche or like over monetizing or optimizing or whatever, but the other thing is the guy is pretty humble in person, hasn\u2019t let money go to him which is also awesome, so I would, you know, I\u2019d love to say it\u2019s Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, these big guys, but they\u2019re so far away from what I\u2019m doing that a guy like Neil has just like \u201cFine, he\u2019s 5-6 years ahead of me and he\u2019s kind of done a lot of things consistently and has never stopped creating value\u201d. He\u2019s probably now over-optimizing his site, I don\u2019t really care, he\u2019s continued to provide value which is pretty impressive for 15 years running, right? I don\u2019t know about you, but I don\u2019t know that many people doing that \u2026 probably Gary Vaynerchuk, Rand Fishkin, but<strong> what I like about Neil is that he\u2019s a little bit more in my way of like \u2026 he has multiple businesses and Know-how<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>cognitiveSEO<\/strong>: thank you for joining the first edition of this new podcast and hopefully the listeners will get real insight and draw real value from your input on things. And one last thing: where can people find you online and connect with you?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Sujan:<\/strong> Yeah, <strong>the best place to find me is on website sujanpatel.com, or add me on LinkedIn<\/strong>, hot new network so check up the status of things there, but yeah, come find me there, ping me; I\u2019m an open book, just ask questions. Just don\u2019t ask Google stuff, search the simple stuff before you ask.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;re thrilled to bring to your attention the third episode of our cognitiveSEO Talks: On Search and Traffic, this time with a beloved digital expert, Sujan Patel. He&#8217;s a marvelous marketing expert, entrepreneur and growth hacker widely known for his multiple publications and articles in the industry, his successful management of various big companies, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":17769,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17734","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-seo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17734","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17734"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17734\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23958,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17734\/revisions\/23958"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17734"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17734"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17734"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}