{"id":6773,"date":"2014-11-19T12:38:52","date_gmt":"2014-11-19T10:38:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/?p=6773"},"modified":"2026-06-17T17:34:19","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T14:34:19","slug":"the-diacritics-seo-technique-a-tactic-nobody-is-using","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/6773\/the-diacritics-seo-technique-a-tactic-nobody-is-using\/","title":{"rendered":"Diacritics in SEO: An Overlooked Opportunity for International Search Visibility"},"content":{"rendered":"

A topic worth revisiting is how search engines handle diacritics in modern SEO. That is, how accented and non-accented characters (like \u201c\u00e9\u201d vs \u201ce\u201d) affect search visibility and organic performance. In this article, we look at how Google interprets diacritics today and what this means for search traffic in multilingual environments.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Diacritics<\/p>\n

Let’s get straight to the point with an example. Is there a difference between searching for \u201cHaagen Dazs\u201d versus searching for \u201cH\u00e4<\/strong>agen Dazs\u201d? I know they\u2019re probably some ice-cream producer from Denmark (it sure sounds like they could be, and they definitely sound old), but why did they have to make their name so difficult to spell? Where do I even find those two dots to put on the \u201ca\u201d? I don\u2019t care what it\u2019s called, why won\u2019t they just let me look for my ice-cream?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A diacritic is a mark added to a letter that can change pronunciation, meaning, or grammatical function depending on the language. You might remember the acute, grave and circumflex accents from your high school french class? It\u2019s exactly like those, only there\u2019s a much larger variety of diacritics than just those. All of the following are diacritics and none of them sound like the letters they are based on: \u00e1, \u00ed, \u00f3, \u00fa, \u00fd, \u00f8, \u00e5, \u00e4, \u00f6, \u00e2, \u00ea, \u00ef, \u0219, \u021b, \u010d, \u0107, \u0111, \u0161, \u017e, \u0101, \u0113, \u012b, \u016b, \u010d, \u0123 \u0137, \u013c, \u0146, \u0105, \u0119, \u0142, \u0144, \u015b, \u017a etc. Even though they can be found in languages all over the world, regardless of the alphabet that is used (including languages that use Latin scripts as well as transliterated forms in other writing systems), for simplicity we are just going to refer to examples from the Latin alphabet.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

French is probably the first example that springs to mind, followed shortly by German. In fact, all Germanic languages (Danish, Icelandic, Swedish, Norwegian) use diacritics to some extent. Several other language families are quite keen on diacritics: Slavic (this includes Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Polish, Slovak and Slovene), Baltic (meaning Latvian and Lithuanian) and Finno-Ugric (with the unlikely related Estonian, Finnish and Hungarian). These aren\u2019t even all the languages containing diacritics from the ones using Latin alphabets. The world of languages is full of mysterious, and weird accents \u2013 at least to the eye of the English speaker. But even he (or she) must admit that these accents can lend specificity to certain words, especially when applied to imported words.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

English too, it seems, has taken a linking to these funny accents, which is why we refer to our future husband or wife as our \u201cfianc\u00e9e\u201d (and not spelling it with the accented first \u2018e\u2019 is underlined in red, as a grammar mistake, by your spelling processor). The acute accent is quite popular, in fact, as it is found in several more or less popular words such as \u201ccaf\u00e9\u201d, \u201cclich\u00e9\u201d, \u201cr\u00e9sum\u00e9\u201d, but also \u201cexpos\u00e9\u201d, \u201cmat\u00e9\u201d, or \u201crisqu\u00e9\u201d. But the acute accent on \u2018e\u2019 is not the only instance of a diacritic being used in English. Examples also include words like \u201cjalape\u00f1o\u201d, \u201cna\u00efve\u201d and \u201cp\u00e2t\u00e9\u201d, not to mention brand names such as \u201cL\u00f6wenbr\u00e4u\u201d, \u201c\u0160koda\u201d or \u201cCitro\u00ebn.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

How does Google Rank Sites for the Same Keywords with and without Diacritics ?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

Does any of this matter from a SEO perspective? Will you get different results for \u201cSkoda\u201d than for \u201c\u0160koda\u201d, or for typing \u201cMotorhead\u201d instead of \u201cM\u00f6torhead\u201d? If your language is keen on diacritics, should you be too?<\/p>\n

\n

If you are in the SEO business, the question you want to start with is how Google ranks sites for the same keywords with and without diacritics. <\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

The answer today is: mostly not in a meaningful ranking sense. Let’s take a look at the screenshot below and clear things up.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Diacritic<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Searching for \u201cQuebec\u201d vs \u201cQu\u00e9bec\u201d generally produces highly similar results today, with Google normalizing most diacritic variants in indexing and ranking. The answer box and the first two results are the same in both cases: the region\u2019s Wikipedia page and their official site (in exactly this order). Minor variations may still appear, but they are typically related to personalization, language detection, or query context\u2014not strict character matching. Historically there could be indexing differences, but modern Google indexing does not produce such large disparities for diacritic variants in most languages. The results on the first page are also different.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

There are some similarities on the first page, but not in the same order and not everything found in one case is reflected in the other. The images are also slightly different. Better yet: the related search box is different: the diacritic spelling suggests \u201cqu\u00e9bec solidaire\u201d, \u201cemploi qu\u00e9bec\u201d \u201crevenu qu\u00e9bec\u201d, \u201cloto qu\u00e9bec\u201d, while the non-diacritic spelling suggests \u201cquebec independence\u201d, \u201cquebec map\u201d, \u201cquebec weather\u201d, \u201cquebec food\u201d.Today, differences in intent are usually driven by query language, location, or user behavior signals rather than the presence or absence of diacritics alone.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Diacritic<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Another example that you can see in the image above is \u201ca la carte\u201d. Or, for the connoisseurs, \u201c\u00e0 la carte.\u201d The number of search results favors the public in the know this time, with almost twice as many results for \u201c\u00e0\u201d than for \u201ca.\u201d A less dramatic difference, at any rate. When it comes to the order of results, however, things get complicated. The page \u201ca la carte kitchen\u201d, for instance, shows 4th for the diacritic search but almost at the bottom of the page for the non-diacritic search.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The vocabulary entry for \u201ca la carte\u201d does not even rank on the first page of the non-diacritic search. Related search suggestions tend to tell the same story as before: different audiences might be using different spellings. The first recommendation for those who like their \u201ca\u201d clean is \u201ca la carte definition\u201d, while for those who are not afraid of a little accent its \u201ca la carte pronunciation\u201d, suggesting a more sophisticated enquiry into the topic.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Does Google Consider Diacritic and Non-Diacritic Keywords Synonyms?<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n

To b\u00e9 or not to be a Google Search Geek \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

Honesty aside, the more relevant marketing question is:<\/p>\n

\n

Does Google consider diacritic and non-diacritic keywords synonyms?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

For most brands, it does, at least partially. H\u00e4agen-Dazs, for instance, reveals itself to you even when you are unworthy and spell it diacritics-free.<\/p>\n

\"Diacritic<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

But what happens when we search for some other query that isn’t a brand? Let’s take\u00a0r\u00e9sum\u00e9 for instance. Whether we search for this keyword with its original writing, or we search it diacritics free, Google understand that it’s a Curriculum Vitae we are talking about and returns results related to this. Indeed, the results vary but they are all related to the same concept; they all give you information about how to write a resume or resumes’ templates. \u00a0This means that the big G understands the user’s intent and provides him with relevant results instead of stumbling into exact matches searches.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The same thing happens when, for instance you search for “\u00e9cole fran\u00e7aise”,\u00a0\u201cecole francaise\u201d or a combination of the two like\u00a0\u201c\u00e9cole francaise\u201d. The results do vary tremendously but what is important to mention is that Google understand that is a French school you are searching for and provides you with results accordingly to your intent.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

How to Spot if Your Site is Bleeding “Diacritic” Traffic?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sometimes you want to fish in the big pond, while other times it might be worth your time focusing on the small pond. J\u00e4germeister is not just a famous hunters’ drink \u00a0(the name when literally translated means “master of hunters”) but also a good example of how a business can save money.<\/p>\n

\n

It seems that barely anyone is searching for \u201cj\u00e4germeister\u201d (although that is the correct spelling) and most people are searching for \u201cjagermeister\u201d (almost 17 times more than the first category).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

Who is looking for the diacritic version? Is it just Germans or is there an extremely loyal fan base that is really crazy about correct spelling? As Matthew McConaughey\u2019s character in the recent Interstellar movie would encourage, you need to take your observations further and draw some conclusions from them. After all, the market for \u201c\u00e4\u201d might be several degrees of magnitude smaller than the market for \u201ca\u201d, but it\u2019s also about 5 times cheaper to advertise on it. So if your business is also smaller, or in its infancy, the best thing for you might be to take advantage of that and go for the less competitive market.<\/p>\n

\"Jagermeister<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Linguistic Precision: Why Basic Brand Trackers Fail<\/strong><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

Beyond search visibility, diacritics also point to a broader challenge in digital analytics: the need for linguistic precision when tracking brand mentions across languages and regions.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

In multilingual environments, small variations in spelling, accents, and local usage can affect how accurately online conversations are captured and interpreted. This is especially relevant in brand monitoring, where missing or misclassifying mentions can distort the overall picture of sentiment and reach.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Some entry-level tracking tools rely heavily on exact keyword matching, which can limit their ability to capture these variations consistently across languages.<\/p>\n

\n

More advanced social listening platforms, such as BrandMentions<\/a>, take a more contextual approach, analyzing mentions across multiple languages and focusing on semantic meaning rather than strict character matching.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This allows for a more complete view of how brands are discussed globally, including variations that would otherwise be missed in basic keyword-based systems.<\/p>\n

Important Tips to Better Optimize Your Site for Diacritics<\/strong><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

Obviously there is some overlap between searches, but there are also relevant differences. Is there a way to use these differences to your advantage?<\/p>\n

\n

Follow the Accent and Optimize Your Site!<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

Say you were looking for a gift idea for someone you don\u2019t know well enough (yes, we know it\u2019s a bit early for Christmas examples, so let\u2019s just assume it\u2019s a birthday). If you were French, or in France, or for whatever reason did the search in French, you might be interested in knowing that the phrase \u201cid\u00e9es cadeaux homme\u201d is almost 10 times more searched than simply \u201cidees cadeaux homme\u201d. They seem to be very fond of the specificities of their language \u2013 and there\u2019s nothing wrong with that. But this is something to take into account if you are in the business of gift ideas for men targeted at French-speaking (or simply French-searching) audiences.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

If you are targeting multilingual or local audiences, include the correct diacritic forms naturally in content, but avoid keyword stuffing or duplicating variants unnaturally. Just know that every other site is doing the same. If, however, you are going for a less populated but perhaps also a less competitive market, then make sure to also include the non-diacritic version of the same key words. It\u2019s also worth trying to figure out who uses the non-diacritic version of the phrase: is it French people who are not in France (and hence might not easily find their beloved accents on our keyboards)? Is it foreigners who are visiting France (and for some reason feel compelled to do as the French do)? Is it young French nationals who simply don\u2019t feel like adding in the diacritics? Whoever they are, there might be some unique thing they might benefit from marketing-wise, in addition to finding what they searched for.<\/p>\n

\"Idee<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

So, if your site is specific to a particular country and the people from that country use diacritics, you can do a bit of marketing research by testing generic keywords that have considerable traffic and seeing whether the diacritic or non-diacritic version draws the largest numbers. Extrapolating from that, you could make several assumptions on who and when (or even if) uses diacritics in their searches.<\/p>\n

\n

It’s just a diacritic.. or is it a strong marketing tool?<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

Of course, sometimes the accent itself might be a marketing tool. Take Haagen Dazs, for example. Or is it H\u00e4agen-Dazs? It could have been either, since the name was invented in New York and doesn\u2019t actually mean anything in any language. But it does have that frosty, exquisite feel to it, doesn\u2019t it? That\u2019s exactly what the marketers wanted. Genuine or not, the diacritic is part of the name now, as is for several other brands (and bands as well: Mot\u00f6rhead isn\u2019t really of Germanic descent, but they sure sound more menacing like that, don\u2019t they?)<\/p>\n

\n

Should you or Should You Not use diacritics?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

The answer is yes and by that we mean: use both. If your brand or product category has diacritics in its spelling give Google a helping hand by using both spellings alternatively in the content you publish on your site. Whether it\u2019s \u00a0\u201ca la carte\u201d or even \u201cHaagen Dazs\u201d, simply use a mix of diacritic and non-diacritic spelling in descriptions and as meta keywords. This not only increases your chances of ranking high for two (or more) different searches, but it also contributes to teaching the search engine \u2013 in the long run \u2013 that the two different spellings are actually synonyms for most intents and purposes.\u00a0Of course, traditional criteria such as readability or usability should also be taken into account when making the decision about spelling. Certain areas, such as footers, might be better off with diacritic-free text.<\/p>\n

\"Diacritic<\/p>\n

\"Both<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Should I Use Diacritics in URLs?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

Modern systems allow Unicode URLs (including diacritics), but it is still best practice to use clean ASCII slugs for usability, sharing, and compatibility. Entering the URL with diacritics will be extremely bothersome for anyone who does not have the keyboard set up for the necessary language and in many cases it might be simply too much of an effort for users just to be able to go to your website.<\/p>\n

\"Diacritics<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n

On Google, no one can hear you enunciate. Yet, it seems that Google does take into account the way we search for different keywords: with or without diacritics.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Diacritics are no longer a separate SEO \u201ctechnique\u201d in modern search engines. Google typically normalizes accented and unaccented characters, so the focus should be on intent, language targeting, and content quality rather than character variations. As an online marketer or a SEO expert, you might be \u00a0loosing millions of opportunities daily just by ignoring the “diacritics” aspect. And if you think that this is a matter that doesn’t affect you, just because you are on the English market, think again!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This whole diacritics story might look complicated but the truth is that it is not as hard as you’d think to optimize your site to be “umlauts friendly”. You can analyze your traffic potential just by looking at your targeted keywords, with and without diacritics, and chose the best version out of the two. Once you’ve identified which version suits you better, with or without diacritics, \u00a0all you have to do is optimize your site’s content.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A topic worth revisiting is how search engines handle diacritics in modern SEO. That is, how accented and non-accented characters (like \u201c\u00e9\u201d vs \u201ce\u201d) affect search visibility and organic performance. In this article, we look at how Google interprets diacritics today and what this means for search traffic in multilingual environments.   Let’s get straight […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-seo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6773"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6773\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24977,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6773\/revisions\/24977"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitiveseo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}